Mimblewimble’s approach has the benefit of improving not just privacy, but also scalability and node synchronization speeds. The protocol’s various features additionally allow transaction data to be mixed and removed, thereby reducing the resources that the Mimblewimble network needs to operate. All of these factors offer improvements over both Bitcoin and privacy coins.
After a long development process, Mimblewimble has finally produced two coins, Grin and Beam. Unfortunately, these coins have performed poorly so far. Grin, which was launched on January 14th, has seen its price drop from above $30 to less than $5. Beam, which went live on January 4th, has seen its price fall from above $4 to less than $1. Both of these losses occurred over weeks or days―a bad sign for short-term investors and miners.
(Source: Coingecko)
As always, a few optimists are predicting that Grin and Beam will be more successful in the long term. However, most of Mimblewimble’s hype is not actually based on those coins at all. Instead, many proponents are actually interested in the Mimblewimble protocol itself. Notably, Litecoin founder Charlie Lee has recently praised Mimblewimble, stating that it offers better scalability than Bitcoin.
Meanwhile, Riccardo Spagni, the lead developer of Monero, has also had good things to say. In fact, Monero is currently implementing Mimblewimble on its Tari sidechain, meaning that the technology will be part of a top-fifteen privacy coin in the near future. These developments mean that Mimblewimble could prove to be very successful―even if its first two coins are not.
Article comments